Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
New Jersey v. New York et al.
343 U.S. 974·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 5,
Original,
October Term, 1950.
New Jersey v. New York et al.
Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Robert Peacock, Deputy Attorney General, for complainant. Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney General, Wendell P. Brown, Solicitor General, and Edward L. Ryan, for the State of New York; and Denis M. Hurley, John P. McGrath and Richard H. Burke for the City of New York, defendants. Robert E. Woodside, Attorney General, George G. Chandler, Bernard G. Segal, Wm. A. Schnader and Harry F. Stambaugh for the State of Pennsylvania, intervenor.
[MAJORITY]
The motion of the defendant, City of New York, for leave to file petition to modify the decree entered herein May 25, 1931, 283 U. S. 805, and the motion of defendant, State of New York, for leave to file memorandum in support of the petition are granted.