Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Theodore H. FRANK, et al., petitioners, v. Paloma GAOS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarity Situated, et al.
139 S. Ct. 475202 L. Ed. 2d 363·Supreme Court of the United States·2018
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Theodore H. FRANK, et al., petitioners,
v.
Paloma GAOS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarity Situated, et al.
No. 17-961.
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 6, 2018.
The parties and the Solicitor General are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing whether any named plaintiff has standing such that the federal courts have Article III jurisdiction over this dispute. The briefs, not to exceed 6,000 words, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 p.m., Friday, November 30, 2018. Reply briefs, not to exceed 3,000 words, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 p.m., Friday, December 21, 2018.