General
JEFFREY D. FISI ET AL. v. HOLLY B. CYR ET AL.
243 Conn. 249·Connecticut Supreme Court·1997·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
JEFFREY D. FISI ET AL. v. HOLLY B. CYR ET AL.
(SC 15583)
Callahan, C. J., and Berdon, Norcott, Katz and Palmer, Js.
Argued October 1
officially released November 11, 1997
Martin M. Rutchik, with whom, on the brief, was Sharon L. Gibbs, for the appellant (named plaintiff).
Richard D. Haviland, for the appellee (named defendant).
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
We granted the named plaintiffs petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court; Fisi v. Cyr, 43 Conn. App. 911, 684 A.2d 280 (1996); limited to the following issue: “In the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court denying the plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict based upon allegedly improper communications made by court personnel to the jury during its deliberations?” Fisi v. Cyr, 239 Conn. 955, 688 A.2d 325 (1996).