General
Don Lacy, as Liquidating Agent of the Oklahoma City National Bank, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mollie Ezzard
243 U.S. 631·Supreme Court of the United States·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 619.
Don Lacy, as Liquidating Agent of the Oklahoma City National Bank, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mollie Ezzard.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted April 9, 1917.
Decided April 16, 1917.
Mr. W. F. Wilson and Mr. Enoch A. Chase for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Harvey R. Winn, Mr. Henry E. Asp and Mr. Henry G. Snyder for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of: (1) Chemical National Bank v. Hartford Deposit Co., 161 U. S. 1; Capital National Bank v. First National Bank of Cadiz, 172 U. S. 425; Union National Bank v. McBoyle, 243 U. S. 26. (2) Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Albers Commission Co., 223 U. S. 573, 591; Creswill v. Knights of Pythias, 225 U. S. 246, 261; Norfolk & Western Ry. Co. v. West Virginia, 236 U. S. 605, 609-610. (3) Southern Pacific Co. v. Schuyler, 227 U. S. 60l, 611-612.