General
HAYS v. WALKER et al.
16 Ala. App. 33677 So. 930·Alabama Court of Appeals·1918·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(77 South. 930)
HAYS v. WALKER et al.
(5 Div. 265.)
(Court of Appeals of Alabama.
Jan. 15, 1918.)
Appeal and Error &wkey;>719(l) — Assignments of Error — Necessity.
In the absence of assignments of error, no error can be considered except one of jurisdiction.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Elmore County; Leon McCord, Judge.
Action between R. H. I-Iays and Lucinda Walker and others. ’ Prom the judgment, Hays appeals.
Affirmed.
T. G. Ililyer, of Tallassee, for appellant. P. W. Lull, of Wetumpka, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — SAMPORD, J.]
SAMPORD, J.
There are no assignments of error, and under the rule and tire decisions, no error can be considered, except one of jurisdiction. The trial court had jurisdiction, and the judgment is -affirmed.
Affirmed.