General
Emery Transportation Co. v. United States et al.; Hoffman et al. v. O'Brien, Police Commissioner, et al.
339 U.S. 955·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
May 15, 1950.
Per Curiam Decisions.
No. 754. No. 755.
Emery Transportation Co. v. United States et al. Hoffman et al. v. O’Brien, Police Commissioner, et al.
Clarence D. Todd, Dale C. Dillon and Harry Kasfir for appellant in No. 754.
Julius Hallheimer for appellants in No. 755.
Solicitor General Perlman, Daniel W. Knowlton, Albert B. Rosenbaum and David Axelrod for appellees in No. 754.
Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney General of New York, Wendell P. Brown, Solicitor General, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz, Assistant Attorney General, for Goldstein; and John P. McGrath, Frank S. Hogan, Seymour B. Quel and Whitman Knapp for O’Brien et al., appellees in No. 755.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio; and
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.