Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Hadnott et al. v. Amos, Secretary of State of Alabama, et al.
393 U.S. 996·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of these matters.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 647.
Hadnott et al. v. Amos, Secretary of State of Alabama, et al.
Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Jr., Orzell Bill-ingsley, Jr., Robert P. Schwenn, and Melvin L. Wulf on the motion.
[For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., ante, p. 904.]
[MAJORITY]
D. C. M. D. Ala. Motion to dispense with printing jurisdictional statement granted. Probable jurisdiction noted and case set for oral argument on January 21, 1969, together with motion for an order to show cause why Judge Herndon should not be held in contempt and for other relief. Appellants’ briefs shall be filed by January 3, 1969, and responding briefs by January 17, 1969. Case may be presented on original record, without printing.
Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of these matters.