Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
The Buffalo, New York and Erie Railroad Company, Appellant, v. John A. Stevens, Respondent
51 N.Y. 659·New York Commission of Appeals·1873·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Buffalo, New York and Erie Railroad Company, Appellant, v. John A. Stevens, Respondent.
(Argued October 3, 1872;
decided January term, 1873.)
This action was brought to recover back the sum of $1,081 alleged to have been paid by mistake by plaintiff to defendant. The mistake was alleged to have occurred in settling the accounts of defendant, as trustee for bondholders, under a certain mortgage made by the Buffalo City Railroad to defendant as such trustee. That mortgage was foreclosed by defendant, and after judgment plaintiff, as owner of the equity of redemption, settled, paying defendant the item in dispute which the latter claimed under the judgment. Held, 1st. That there was no mistake as to the provisions of the judgment ; and the payment having been voluntarily made, could not be recovered back; 2d. That- by the decree defendant was entitled to the sum in question. This was based upon the authority of a former case in this court. In the matter of the B., N. Y. dé E. R. R'. Go. for an accounting with Stevens, as trustee, etc., wherein this portion of the judgment was construed, which construction the court held binding.
A. P. Laning for the appellant.
John Ganson for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Hunt, C.,]
Hunt, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Order affirmed, and judgment absolute ordered against plaintiff.