General
Phineas D. Crosby, Appellant, v. Hiram Hotaling et al., Respondents
99 N.Y. 661·New York Court of Appeals·1885·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Phineas D. Crosby, Appellant, v. Hiram Hotaling et al., Respondents.
(Argued June 1, 1885;
decided June 23, 1885.)
This case presented questions as to the reception and rejection of evidence of no general importance.
William B. Hurd, Jr., for appellant.
S. W. Rosendale for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Miller, J.,]
Miller, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.