General
John CORNELL and George Gilmore, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
4 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1924
Before ROGERS and HOUGH, Circuit Judges, and LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John CORNELL and George Gilmore, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 2, 1924.)
No. 84.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Meyer Greenberg, of New York City, for plaintiff in error Cornell. Alexander S. Drescher, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff in. error Gilmore. Ralph G. Greene, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Wm. A. De Groot, Asst. U. S. Atty. of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for the United States.
Before ROGERS and HOUGH, Circuit Judges, and LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.