Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
DAVIS, TRUSTEE, v. SOJA, INTERNAL REVENUE AGENT
374 U.S. 495·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DAVIS, TRUSTEE, v. SOJA, INTERNAL REVENUE AGENT.
No. 271.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Walter J. Rockier for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cox for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that this ease is moot, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.