General

Milton S. Arnold, as Surviving Partner of the Firm of M. Arnold & Company et al., Appellants, v. The R. Rothschild's Sons Company, Respondent

164 N.Y. 562·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Milton S. Arnold, as Surviving Partner of the Firm of M. Arnold & Company et al., Appellants, v. The R. Rothschild’s Sons Company, Respondent. Arnold v. Bofhschild’s Sons Go., 37 App. Div. 564, affirmed. (Argued June 18, 1900; decided October 2, 1900.) Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 8, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term, and- an order denying a motion for a new trial. Herbert R. limburger and Henry L. Scheuerman for appellants. Mark M. Sehlesinger and Frcmk 0. Avery for respondent. [MAJORITY] Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Vann and Landon, JJ. Not voting: Cullen, J.