General
FENSTER v. LEARY, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.
386 U.S. 10·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FENSTER v. LEARY, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.
No. 905.
Decided February 13, 1967.
Emanuel Redfield for appellant.
J. Lee Rankin for Learys and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Joel Lewittes, Assistant Attorney General, for Koota, appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.