Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Bank of the Metropolis, Respondent, v. Eberhard Faber, Appellant; Holmes, Booth & Haydens, Respondents, v. Same, Appellant; Charles Leonard et al., Respondents, v. Same, Appellant
149 N.Y. 600·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Bank of the Metropolis, Respondent, v. Eberhard Faber, Appellant. Holmes, Booth & Haydens, Respondents, v. Same, Appellant. Charles Leonard et al., Respondents, v. Same, Appellant.
(Submitted May 25, 1896;
decided June 2, 1896.)
Motions to fix a time for the hearing of questions in the above-entitled cases, certified to the Court of Appeals for determination by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, under subdivision 2 of section 190 of the Code of Civil Procedure, by orders made March 6, 1896, appeals having been taken from interlocutory judgments in favor of the plaintiffs, overruling demurrers to the complaints.
Thomson & Allen for motion.
[MAJORITY]
Ordered : These cases are to remain upon the motion calendar and be heard upon next motion day as motions.