Torts · MBE-tested

Julius Christensen, Respondent, v. The 14 East 23rd Street Excellent Goody Shop, Inc., Appellant

259 A.D. 1041·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1940·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Julius Christensen, Respondent, v. The 14 East 23rd Street Excellent Goody Shop, Inc., Appellant. [MAJORITY] In an action for damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant in opening cellar doors on the sidewalk without a warning, the plaintiff has recovered judgment after a trial before the court without a jury. The appeal is based solely upon the theory that the damages allowed are excessive. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.