General
Mary Perry, Appellant, v. Hudson and Manhattan Railroad Company, Respondent
156 A.D. 892·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1913·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
First Department,
April, 1913.
Mary Perry, Appellant, v. Hudson and Manhattan Railroad Company, Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 30th day of' September, 1912,- setting aside a verdict and granting a motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The evidence upon which this motion was made fails to state any newly-discovered evidence which would justify the court in setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial. ' The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the verdict reinstated. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and verdict reinstated.