Torts · MBE-tested
KINATEDER et al. v. UNSTED STATES
282 F. 861·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1922
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KINATEDER et al. v. UNSTED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
April 18, 1922.)
No. 2971.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois.
Suit by the United States against Math Kinateder and others. From a decree granting an injunction, defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
Rush B. Johnson, of Chicago, 111., for appellants.
P. H. Ward, of Sterling, 111., for the United States.
Before BAKER, ALSCHULER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from a decree enjoining appellants from maintaining a nuisance on premises therein described. The opinions in Lewinsohn v. U. S., 278 Fed. 421, Allen v. U. S., 278 Fed. 429, Shore v. U. S., 282 Fed. 857, and Heitler v. U. S., 280 Fed. 703, recently decided by this court, are decisive of all the questions presented on this appeal.
The decree is affirmed.