General
Hyde v. Continental Trust Company
157 U.S. 65439 L. Ed. 845·Supreme Court of the United States·1895
The opinion of Mr. Justice Field was entitled in this case as well as in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company. · Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Hablan dissented from the decree in this case for the reasons given in their dissenting opinions in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hyde v. Continental Trust Company.
No. 894.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
[MAJORITY — The Chief Justice:]
The Chief Justice:
This ease differs in no essential respect from that just decided, and must be disposed of in the same way.
Decree accordingly.
The opinion of Mr. Justice Field was entitled in this case as well as in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company.
Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Hablan dissented from the decree in this case for the reasons given in their dissenting opinions in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company.