Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
L. M. DYKE, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
67 F.2d 991·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
L. M. DYKE, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 7190.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 23, 1933.
Before BRYAN, POSTER, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Court Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard upon the joint stipulation of counsel that the above entitled and numbered cause be docketed, reversed, and remanded to the United States Board of Tax Appeals, and that a final order may be entered that there is a deficiency for the year 1922 in the sum of $143.-55, and that there is a deficiency in the sum of $946.63 and a penalty in the sum of $47.-33 for the year 1923, and that there is a deficiency in the sum of $89.08 and a penalty of $4.45 for the year 1924, and that the said deficiencies and penalties may be assessed and collected immediately without regard to the restrictions, if any, contained in the Revenue Acts of 1926, 1928, and 1932 (see 26 USCA).
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the order of the United States Board of Tax Appeals of August 15, 1932, in the above entitied and numbered cause be reversed, and tliaf said cause be remanded to the United States Board of Tax Appeals, that an order may be entered that there is a deficiency for the year 1922 in the sum of $143.55, that there is a deficiency for the year 1923 in the sum of $946.63 and a penalty for the year 1923 in the sum of $47.33, and that there is a deficiency for the year 1924 in the sum of $89.08 and a penalty for said year 1924 of $4.45; and that the said deficiencies and penalties may be assessed and collected immediately without regard to the restrictions, if any, contained in the Revenue Acts of 1926, 1928 and 1932.
It is further ordered and adjudged that a certified copy of this judgment be forwarded to the United States Board of Tax Appeals, without delay.