Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Property · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The City of New York, Appellant, v. Timothy L. Woodruff, as Lieutenant-Governor of the State of New York, et al., Composing the Commissioners of the Land Office of the State of New York, et al., Respondents
159 N.Y. 536·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The City of New York, Appellant, v. Timothy L. Woodruff, as Lieutenant-Governor of the State of New York, et al., Composing the Commissioners of the Land Office of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.
People ex rel. City of New York v. Woodruff, 89 App. Div. 123, affirmed.
(Argued April 19, 1899;
decided May 12, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of • the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 22, 1899, affirming an order of Special Term denying the appellant’s motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus in a proceeding instituted in behalf of the dock department of the city of New York to compel the commissioners of the land office to insert certain terms and conditions in a grant of land under water which they had directed to be issued to Edward A. Whittemore and others for the purposes of commerce.
John Whalen, Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley, Theodore Connoly, Charles Blandy and Edwin J. Freedman of counsel), for appellant.
John C. Ernies, Attorney-General, Theodore E. Ha/ncoeh and George W. Stephens for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion, below.
All concur.