Criminal Law · MBE-tested

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Floyd Dinan, Frank Poplees, Also Known as Frank Day and Albert Bricker, Appellants

11 A.D.2d 1070·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1960·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Floyd Dinan, Frank Poplees, Also Known as Frank Day and Albert Bricker, Appellants. [MAJORITY] Pursuant to section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the defendants, who have Been released by virtue of a certificate of reasonable doubt, move to extend their time to argue their pending appeal and for a further stay of the judgment of conviction pending the determination of the appeal. Motion granted, and defendants’ time enlarged to the January 1961 Term, on condition that they perfect their appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at -said term. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.