Corporations
Paul Stargick, Respondent, v. Excello Spring and Manufacturing Corporation and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Charles Nygard and Others, Appellants
232 A.D. 693·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1931·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Paul Stargick, Respondent, v. Excello Spring and Manufacturing Corporation and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Charles Nygard and Others, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order directing examination before trial and discovery and inspection affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice at the place and hour stated in the order. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.