Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Edmund F. Bennett, Plaintiff, v. John I. Thompson et al., Appellants. In the Matter of the Application of Clara F. Bennett to Revive and Continue, etc., Respondent
143 N.Y. 624·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edmund F. Bennett, Plaintiff, v. John I. Thompson et al., Appellants. In the Matter of the Application of Clara F. Bennett to Revive and Continue, etc., Respondent.
(Argued June 4,1894;
decided June 19, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made Febuary 13, ' 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion to revive and continue this action.
Henry J. Speck for appellants.
George R. Donnan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.