Contracts · MBE-tested

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DIFCO LABORATORIES, INC., Respondent

522 F.2d 1275·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1975

Before EDWARDS, CELEBREZZE and McCREE, Circuit Judges.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DIFCO LABORATORIES, INC., Respondent. No. 75-1357. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Oct. 13, 1975. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Bernard Gottfried, Director, Region 7, N. L. R. B., Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Stewart J. Katz, Keller, Thoma, Top-pin & Schwarze, Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Before EDWARDS, CELEBREZZE and McCREE, Circuit Judges. [MAJORITY] ORDER On receipt. and consideration of the briefs and records in the above-styled case; and Finding in the entire record substantial evidence to support the findings of fact and conclusions of law arrived at by the National Labor Relations Board, The Board’s order is hereby enforced. . The Board’s order is reported at 216 N.L.R.B. No. 13 (1974).