General
Norman Y. Brintnall, Respondent, v. Samuel M. Rice, Appellant
173 N.Y. 618·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Norman Y. Brintnall, Respondent, v. Samuel M. Rice, Appellant.
Brintnall v. Bice, 63 App. Div. 54, affirmed.
(Argued January 14, 1903;
decided January 30, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 3, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
P. Lewis Anderson and Edmard A. Alexander for . appellant.
Albert W. Venino for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ.