Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Kneeland S. Townsend, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Charles O'Connor, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
73 N.Y. 617·New York Court of Appeals·1878·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Kneeland S. Townsend, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Charles O’Connor, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued April 15, 1878;
decided April 23, 1878.)
Disposed of on the facts ; the court holding that a mere question of fact, determined below, upon conflicting evidence was involved, which was not reviewable here.
Samuel Hand for appellant.
William R. Martin for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Earl, J.,]
Earl, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.