General

UNITED STATES versus ONE BALE OF MERCHANDISE, TWO TRUNKS AND TWO BOXES CLAIMED by DAVID C. McKINSTRY

3 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 344·Michigan Supreme Court·1824·MI

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

UNITED STATES versus ONE BALE OF MERCHANDISE, TWO TRUNKS AND TWO BOXES CLAIMED by DAVID C. McKINSTRY [MAJORITY] Papers in File (1816): (1) Claim of David C. McKinstry, replication; (2) subpoena; (3-9) affidavits of Jesse Haskell, Smith Knapp, Abraham A. Skinner, David Grant, Hannah M. Moriarty, Cassander Frisbee and John F. Lawrance; (10) bond of David C. McKinstry and Oliver W. Miller; (11) report and manifest of cargo, affidavits.