Criminal Law · MBE-tested

David C. GOODWIN v. STATE of Arkansas

308 Ark. 98821 S.W.2d 50·Arkansas Supreme Court·1992·AR

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

David C. GOODWIN v. STATE of Arkansas RC 91-63 821 S.W.2d 50 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered January 21, 1992 James Marschewski, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Appellant, David C. Goodwin, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, James Marschewski, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.