Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Maryland, for the use of Levin, et al. v. United States
382 U.S. 876·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 345,
October Term, 1964.
Maryland, for the use of Levin, et al. v. United States,
Theodore E. Wolcott on the petition for rehearing.
[MAJORITY]
381 U. S. 41. The respondent is requested to file, within 20 days, a response to the petition for rehearing limited to the question as to whether this case should be remanded to the District Court for further proceedings with respect to the unresolved issues tendered in the petitioners’ bill of complaint.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration of this petition.