Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
George W. Coe, Respondent, v. Mary Patterson et al., as Administrators of the Estate of Thomas G. Patterson, Deceased, Appellants, Impleaded with Another
184 N.Y. 558·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George W. Coe, Respondent, v. Mary Patterson et al., as Administrators of the Estate of Thomas G. Patterson, Deceased, Appellants, Impleaded with Another.
Coe v. Patterson, 108 App. Div. 360, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted February 26, 1906;
decided March 6, 1906.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 9, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the judgment appealed from does not finally determine the action and that no appeal has been allowed therefrom.
John Van Voorhis <& Sons for motion.
Pierre M: Brown opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs, and case remitted to the Appellate Division as undecided for its determination of the appeal from a final judgment at Special Term.