Criminal Law · MBE-tested
John S. Hulin, Appellant, v. Norman B. Squires et al., as Executors, etc., et al., Respondents
141 N.Y. 560·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John S. Hulin, Appellant, v. Norman B. Squires et al., as Executors, etc., et al., Respondents.
(Argued December 20, 1893 ;
decided January 16, 1894.)
Appeal ' from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made March 15, 1893, which reversed an interlocutory judgment in partition in favor of plaintiff entered upon an order of Special Term, and directed a judgment in favor, of defendants, declaring the plaintiff and defendants, who are the heirs at law of Franklin W. Farnam, deceased, entitled to the real and personal property attempted to be disposed of under the fifth clause of his will.
E. Ooumtryma/n for appellant.
JR. A. Parmenter and Edwin A. King for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of General Term.
All concur, except Babtlett, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.