Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Corliss et al. v. United States
364 U.S. 884·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted as to petitioner Corliss.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 345.
Corliss et al. v. United States.
Herman Alderstein and Hayden C. Covington for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted as to petitioner Corliss.