General
Royal Weaving Company, Appellant, v. Julius Prince, Respondent
137 A.D. 909·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1910·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Royal Weaving Company, Appellant, v. Julius Prince, Respondent.
Appeal from an order entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 14th day of January, 1910, directing the plaintiff tq furnish a further bill of particulars.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The order appealed from should be modified by striking out the words ‘.‘and further specifying the hour and minute when the said alleged repudiation, notification and direction were made, and the hour and minute when the said tender was made, as nearly as the same can be stated,” and as thus modified affirmed, without costs to either party. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs.