Admiralty
THE HACKENSACK. THE TRITON. PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO. v. POTTER TRANSP. CO., Inc.
291 F. 73·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1923
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
THE HACKENSACK. THE TRITON. PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO. v. POTTER TRANSP. CO., Inc.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 16, 1923.)
No. 263.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Suit in admiralty by the Pennsylvania Coal Company, owner of the barge Hackensack, against the Potter Transportation Company, Inc., owner of the steam tug Triton. Decree for respondent (291 Fed. 69), and libelant appeals.
Affirmed.
Park & Mattison, of New York City (Anthony V. Lynch, Jr., of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Bigham, Englar & Jones, of New York City (Leonard J. Matteson and' Andrew J. McElhinney, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before ROGERS, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.