Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Salvatore Peggo, Respondent, v. Thomas Dinan, Appellant
172 N.Y. 605·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Salvatore Peggo, Respondent, v. Thomas Dinan, Appellant.
Peggo v. Dinan, 72 App. Div. 434, appeal dismissed.
(Argued October 6, 1902;
decided October 14, 1902.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 29,1902, ivhich reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion by- plaintiff to amend a judgment previously entered against him and granted said motion.
The motion was made upon the ground that the order of the Appellate Division herein was not appealable to the Court of Appeals as a matter of right.
Jonathan Deyo and John M. Gardner for motion.
Abram J. Rose and Alfred C. Petti opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.