General
SEACAT MARINE DRILLING CO. et al. v. BABINEAUX
382 U.S. 16·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SEACAT MARINE DRILLING CO. et al. v. BABINEAUX.
No. 283.
Decided October 11, 1965.
Marian Mayer Berkett for appellants.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.