General
Kathleen K. Kershaw-York et al., Appellants, v. Harold H. Wolfinger, Jr., et al., Doing Business as Clark and Wolfinger, et al., Respondents
309 A.D.2d 1229765 N.Y.S.2d 536·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2003·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Kathleen K. Kershaw-York et al., Appellants, v. Harold H. Wolfinger, Jr., et al., Doing Business as Clark and Wolfinger, et al., Respondents.
[765 NYS2d 536]
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from so much of an order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Gerace, J.), entered June 6, 2002, which, inter alia, granted the motion for summary judgment of defendants Harold H. Wolfinger, Jr., and Carl G. Clark, doing business as Clark and Wolfinger, dismissing the complaint against them, and granted in part defendant RAM Forest Products, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.