Tax
Kathleen Gorman et al., Respondents, v. Concord Cab Corp., et al., Defendants, and Hugo Hessel et al., Appellants
273 A.D. 983·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1948·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Kathleen Gorman et al., Respondents, v. Concord Cab Corp., et al., Defendants, and Hugo Hessel et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, and for expenses and loss of services arising out of the collision of appellants’ automobile with a taxicab in which the female respondents were passengers, judgment in favor of each of five respondents and against appellants unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.