Administrative
Filjay Imports v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 615·United States Customs Court·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(Reap. Dec. 9637)
Filjay Imports v. United States
Entry No. 876473.
(Decided March 22, 1960)
Siegel, Mandell & Davidson for the plaintiff.
George Gochran Douh, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Oliver, Chief Judge:]
Oliver, Chief Judge:
This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain items of jewelry exported from Japan and entered at the port of New York.
Stipulated facts, upon which, the case is before me, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export, value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is the appraised unit values, less the items covering f.o.b. charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage,:hauling.and lighterage, and petties, as set forth on the invoice, and I so hold.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly. .