Contracts · MBE-tested
ZUCKERMAN et al. v. GREASON
386 U.S. 1517 L. Ed. 2d 696·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Harlan’s dissenting opinion in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520. · Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 530.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ZUCKERMAN et al. v. GREASON.
No. 71.
Decided February 13, 1967.
Leonard Feldman for petitioners.
Samuel Greason, respondent, pro se.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S. 511.
Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Harlan’s dissenting opinion in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520.
Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 530.