Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Indiana
223 U.S. 713·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 114.
The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Indiana.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana.
Argued and submitted December 15, 1911.
Decided December 18, 1911.
Mr. Samuel O. Pickens and Mr.. Lawrence Maxwell for the plaintiff in error. Mr. James Bingham, Mr. Martin M. Hugg and Mr. Thomas M. Honan for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs. Chicago, R. I. & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 219 U. S. 453.