General
In the Matter of the Application of Betty Grady, Appellant, to Compel the Substitution of William A. Wight in the Place and Stead of Harold S. Budner, Respondent, as Attorney for Plaintiff in the Action of Betty Grady, Plaintiff, v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company, Defendant
230 A.D. 822·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1930·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Betty Grady, Appellant, to Compel the Substitution of William A. Wight in the Place and Stead of Harold S. Budner, Respondent, as Attorney for Plaintiff in the Action of Betty Grady, Plaintiff, v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company, Defendant.
[MAJORITY]
Order so far as appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.