Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Henry Youngs et al., Appellants and Respondents, v. Patrick J. McDonald, Respondent and Appellant
166 N.Y. 639·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry Youngs et al., Appellants and Respondents, v. Patrick J. McDonald, Respondent and Appellant.
Youngs v. McDonald, 56 App. Div. 14, affirmed.
(Argued April 16, 1901;
decided April 26, 1901.)
Cross-appeals from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 11, 1900, modifying and affirming as modified an order of Special Term which confirmed the report of a referee appointed to ascertain the damages sustained by defendant by reason of an injunction.
Clarence E. Thornall for appellants and respondents.
James A. Douglas for respondent and appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Landon and Cullen, JJ.