General
Augustus N. Lindsley, Appellant, v. Henry W. Van Cortlandt et al., Respondents
142 N.Y. 682·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Augustus N. Lindsley, Appellant, v. Henry W. Van Cortlandt et al., Respondents.
(Argued April 30, 1894;
decided June 5, 1894.)
■ Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made February 13, 1893, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term, and also reversed an order of Special Term permitting plaintiff to serve a supplemental complaint.
James M. Hunt for appellant.
William, W. Sohrugham and John H. Ferguson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm and for judgment absolute in favor of defendants on stipulation; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.