General
Arcade J. Grise vs. Edward L. Dunn
111 Conn. 719·Connecticut Supreme Court·1930·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Arcade J. Grise vs. Edward L. Dunn.
First Judicial District, Hartford,
March Term, 1930.
Wheeler, C. J., Maltbie, Haines, Hinman and Banks, Js.
Argued March 5th
decided March 6th, 1930.
DeLancey S. Pelgrijt, for the appellant (defendant).
Kendall M. Pierce, for the appellee (plaintiff).
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The appeal, so far as argued, relies upon the claim that the subordinate facts found by the trial court do not justify its conclusion that, "The plaintiff was in the exercise of due care at the time of the accident.” As we read the finding we are of the opinion that this appeal is wholly without merit.
There is no error.