General
MISSISSIPPI WIRE GLASS CO. v. WIRE GLASS CO. et al.
137 F. 1023·United States Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MISSISSIPPI WIRE GLASS CO. v. WIRE GLASS CO. et al.
(Circuit Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.
June 10, 1905.)
No. 23.
Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
A. H. Wintersteen, A. J. Baldwin, and Kerr, Page & Cooper, for complainant.
A. B. Stoughton and Wm. A. Glasgow, Jr., for respondents.
[MAJORITY — J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.]
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
Without discussing the facts in detail at this preliminary stage of the litigation, I think it is enough to say now that the equities of the case appear to be sufficiently in favor of the complainant to justify the court in preserving the present status until final hearing. It is therefore ordered that complainant give bond in the usual form in the sum of $2,500, and that upon the filing thereof a preliminary injunction issue in accordance with the third and fourth prayers of the bill. For cause shown, either party may move to increase or reduce the amount of the bond.