Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Schradin, as Administrator, etc.
220 U.S. 606·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 155.
The New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Schradin, as Administrator, etc.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Argued and submitted April 26, 1911.
Decided May 15, 1911.
Mr. Charles C. Paulding, Mr. Thomas Emery, and Mr. Charles F. Brown for the plaintiff in error. Mr. George Vivian Smith for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Melton, 218 U. S. 36.