Criminal Law · MBE-tested

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Thomas Martell, Appellant

195 A.D.2d 526601 N.Y.S.2d 829·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1993·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Martell, Appellant. [601 NYS2d 829] [MAJORITY] Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered June 2, 1992, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Appellate challenges to the procedures utilized in determining and imposing sentence are forfeited if they are not raised in a timely manner before the trial court (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 281). Therefore, we need not reach the defendant’s contention with respect to restitution. The sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.