Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
Philip C. K. BARTLETT, Executor, et al., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
50 F.2d 1072·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Philip C. K. BARTLETT, Executor, et al., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 8809.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
April 28, 1931.
William M. Morton, of St. Joseph, Mo., and Walter E. Barton, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Prew Savoy, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. G., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decision of United States Board of Tax Appeals reversed, without costs to either-party in this court, and cause remanded to Board of Tax Appeals, on motion of appel-lee and consent of appellants.