General

James O'Brien v. Sidney Rome

140 Conn. 649·Connecticut Supreme Court·1954·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

James O’Brien v. Sidney Rome Inglis, C. J., Baldwin, O’Sdllivan, Wynne and Daly, Js. Argued January 7 decided February 9, 1954 Milton Krevolin, with whom, on the brief, were Morion E. Cole, Cyril Cole and A. Arthur Ciddon, for the appellant (plaintiff). Jacob Bresnerltoff, with whom was Samuel Freed, for the appellee (defendant). [MAJORITY — O’Sullivan, J.] O’Sullivan, J. The legal situation in this ease is identical with that in Stanley v. Hartford, decided this day. The determination of the issues in that case is decisive of those in the case at bar. There is no error. In this opinion the other judges concurred.